Thursday, December 10, 2009

Ethics

aect ethics

What an interesting class! I was thinking about how this could be tied back to the Schuh and Barab article we read at the start of the semester. I think that one's morals can be linked to his ontological and epistemological views. Are morals interpreted and constructed or are they constant and absolute? Obviously the church would hold to the latter. Even if that is true we still have to make choices in the real world which is not so cut and dry. The case that we read today had to clear right or wrong answer. Each decision was laden with moral dilemmas.

Having code of ethics is nothing new. It is possible that the most famous code of ethics was chivalry. A quick Google search will give you a list of this ethical code:

  • To fear God and maintain His Church

  • To serve the liege lord in valor and faith

  • To protect the weak and defenceless

  • To give succour to widows and orphans

  • To refrain from the wanton giving of offence

  • To live by honour and for glory

  • To despise pecuniary reward

  • To fight for the welfare of all

  • To obey those placed in authority

  • To guard the honour of fellow knights

  • To eschew unfairness, meanness and deceit

  • To keep faith

  • At all times to speak the truth

  • To persevere to the end in any enterprise begun

  • To respect the honour of women

  • Never to refuse a challenge from an equal

  • Never to turn the back upon a foe

Some say that chivalry is dead but I would contend that it was never alive to begin with. These were brutal warriors not priests. Which brings me to my point: Should warriors be expected to follow the same ethical code that bishops and priests live by? I don't know the answer to that.

No comments:

Post a Comment